Lanthanide-doped upconverting nanostructures are promising materials in the generation of imaging agents for modern biomedical applications, in particular in optical diagnostics (Prodi et al. 2015). Upconversion (UC) is a phenomenon involving optical emission at higher energies than that of the exciting radiation, through sequential absorptions of photons. Lanthanide ions are particularly useful for this process, due to a peculiar energy levels scheme and relatively long-excited states lifetimes (Auzel 2004). In the past decades, many hosts and types of lanthanide ions have been chosen to customize the luminescence properties of the nanosystems, tailoring also their structure to fit efficiently the final application. In this context, some reviews have appeared in the literature describing preparation of lanthanide-doped nanocrystals (DaCosta et al. 2014; Gainer and Romanowski 2014; Hemmer et al. 2013; Y. Liu et al. 2013; Wang and Liu 2009; Yang et al. 2014; Zhou et al. 2012) evidencing the high interest and activity of the field. In these reviews, several factors such as morphology, crystalline phase, size, and components of these nanomaterials have been demonstrated to be crucial parameters acting on their electrical, photophysical, magnetic, and colloidal stability properties (Sun et al. 2014; van Veggel et al. 2012), see Figure 3.1.
Lanthanide-doped upconverting nanostructures are promising materials in the generation of imaging agents for modern biomedical applications, in particular in optical diagnostics (Prodi et al. 2015). Upconversion (UC) is a phenomenon involving optical emission at higher energies than that of the exciting radiation, through sequential absorptions of photons. Lanthanide ions are particularly useful for this process, due to a peculiar energy levels scheme and relatively long-excited states lifetimes (Auzel 2004). In the past decades, many hosts and types of lanthanide ions have been chosen to customize the luminescence properties of the nanosystems, tailoring also their structure to fit efficiently the final application. In this context, some reviews have appeared in the literature describing preparation of lanthanide-doped nanocrystals (DaCosta et al. 2014; Gainer and Romanowski 2014; Hemmer et al. 2013; Y. Liu et al. 2013; Wang and Liu 2009; Yang et al. 2014; Zhou et al. 2012) evidencing the high interest and activity of the field. In these reviews, several factors such as morphology, crystalline phase, size, and components of these nanomaterials have been demonstrated to be crucial parameters acting on their electrical, photophysical, magnetic, and colloidal stability properties (Sun et al. 2014; van Veggel et al. 2012), see Figure 3.1.
The target of this chapter is to briefly illustrate the diverse synthesis of UC nanomaterials, with particular attention to the composition of the host and to the architecture of the nanostructures, tailored to produce efficient luminescent nanomaterials.
Figure 3.1 UC emission obtained from RE nanoparticles with controlled size and structure can be used for many biological applications, thanks to multicolor and tunable emissions. These rationally designed nanostructures and nanocomposites can be engineered to meet various applications, such as imaging, detection, and sensing. (Reprinted with permission from Sun, L. D., Y. F. Wang, and C. H. Yan. 2014. Paradigms and challenges for bioapplication of rare earth upconversion luminescent nanoparticles: Small size and tunable emission/excitation spectra. Acc. Chem. Res. 47:1001–1009. Copyright 2014 American Chemical Society.)
Among the factors affecting the UC properties of nanomaterials, the choice of the species that absorb (sensitizers) and emit (activators) the radiation is of paramount importance. The mainly exploited sensitizer is Yb3+, characterized by a single transition in the near-infrared (NIR) range, around 980 nm, (2F7/2 → 2F5/2 transition) closely matching the energies of the excited states of several activator ions such as Er3+, Tm3+, and Ho3+. The doping amounts of both sensitizer and activator ions define the luminescence features of the nanomaterials, since they have to be optimized taking into account the delicate balance between the quite high amount required to favor energy transfer toward the activator, and the prevention of detrimental cross-relaxation processes (Mita et al. 1995).
Appropriate selection of suitable host materials for efficient UC emission is also of paramount importance. Important properties of these hosts are
Moreover, the UC emission efficiency strongly depends on the vibrational properties of the host, influencing nonradiative relaxations for the excited states of the emitting lanthanide ions. The latter processes involve multiphonon assisted deactivation processes, in which the phonons are bridging the energy gap between the emitting level and the next lower lying energy level of the lanthanide ion. As a general rule, the larger is the number of phonons needed to bridge this energy gap and the higher is the efficiency of the radiative emission (Chen et al. 2013). Therefore, to increase the UC emission efficiency, it is desirable to have lanthanide ions embedded in a host for which the phonon energies are as low as possible. The cutoff phonon energy depends on the type of host, and in general, fluoride-based materials have lower phonon energies than oxide compounds (Chen et al. 2014). For instance, cutoff phonon energies for Y2O3 (Vetrone et al. 2004) (around 500 cm−1) and ZrO2 (Patra et al. 2003a) (around 550 cm−1) are much higher than for NaYF4 (Ivaturi et al. 2013) (around 350 cm−1). The efficiency of a UC emission is also strongly dependent on the local symmetry of the site in which the lanthanide ion is accommodated (Peacock 1975). Due to the peculiar character of lanthanide 4f–4f transitions, a lower local symmetry is favorable for increasing the emission efficiency (Krämer et al. 2004; Lin et al. 2014; Schafer et al. 2009).
The development of synthetic strategies for efficient luminescent nanomaterials with defined size, shape, composition, and phase is of paramount importance. This section is devoted to the description of the most popular synthetic methods approaches to obtain tailored nanomaterials in a facile and controlled way. We will mainly focus on the advantages (pros) and disadvantages (cons) for each approach and in order to help the reader in the comparison, we have summarized the main features in Table 3.1.
The coprecipitation method is characterized by simple protocols, quite short reaction times, simple reaction conditions, and cheap experimental setups. In this procedure, the nucleation of the nanocrystals can be promoted using capping agents (such as polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) or polyethyleneimine (PEI)). In some cases, the nanoparticles (NPs) are directly generated without the need of postformation heat treatments, in others cases, annealing is necessary to obtain the desired phase.
Synthetic Methods |
Hosts (Examples) |
Pros |
Cons |
---|---|---|---|
Coprecipitation |
LaF3, NaYF4, GdF3 Y2O3, Lu2O3, Gd3Ga5O12 LuPO4 YbPO4 GdOF, Gd4O3F6 Lu6O5F8 |
|
|
Thermolysis |
LaF3, NaYF4, NaGdF4 Y2O3, Gd2O3 LaOF, GdOF |
|
|
Solvo(hydro)thermal |
NaYF4, NaLuF4 YbF3, YF3, GdF3 CaF2, SrF2, CaGd3F11 Gd2O3, Er2O3 |
|
|
Sol–gel |
ZrO2, BaTiO3, TiO2 Titanates (nanotubes) Y2O3, Gd2O3, Lu3Ga5O12 YVO4 |
|
|
Combustion |
Y2O3, Lu2O3, Gd2O3 Gd3Ga5O12 |
|
|
ILs |
YF3, GdF3, EuF3 NaYF4, NaGdF4 |
|
|
First examples were published by Van Veggel and coworkers, that synthesized LaF3 nanoparticles, containing emitters such as Eu, Er, Nd, and Ho, using di-n-octadecyldithiophosphate as a surfactant (Stouwdam and van Veggel 2002) and by Cho et al. (Yi and Chow 2005), who obtained a very small particle size (around 5 nm), with NPs easily dispersible in water.
To prepare the most famous UC phosphor NaYF4, other authors used relatively low reaction temperatures using amines as solvents (Heer et al. 2004). Yi et al. (2004) used and lanthanide–ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) complexes as starting material. The tuning of the molar ratio of EDTA to total lanthanides allowed the control of nanoparticle size from 40 to 170 nm, but samples were affected by low luminescence emission efficiency and rather poor monodispersion. Other approaches succeeded in developing hexagonal-phase NaYF4:Yb,Er/Tm nanocrystals with tunable sizes: these systems were formed starting from small amorphous NaYF4 nanoparticles obtained by precipitation, and by a subsequent treatment at higher temperature (300°C), and showed higher up-conversion emission efficiency (Li and Zhang 2008; Li et al. 2008).
Hollow mesoporous GdF3 nanoparticles were prepared also by coprecipitation method by Lv et al. (2013) using pH controlled solutions.
Sesquioxides have been prepared by this method. For instance, Er3+, Yb3+ codoped Y2O3 upconverting nanoparticles (UCNPs) have been prepared by using a coprecipitation method followed by a postthermal treatment, using a surfactant (cetyltrimethylammonium bromide, CTAB) that had an important role in controlling the size (Lu et al. 2014). Moreover, Er3+, Yb3+ codoped Lu2O3 nanoparticles with several sizes and shapes (nano-aggregates, sub-micrometer wires, and nanospheres) were prepared by the coprecipitation technique. It was found that different reactant ratios of lanthanide to urea precipitant produced uniform spherical nanoparticles with sizes of 45, 100, 165, 200, and 250 nm (Zheng et al. 2014).
Er3+-doped Garnet (Gd3Ga5O12) nanoparticles were also prepared by Daldosso et al. (2008) by coprecipitation, showing quite good UC emission.
Phosphate nanoparticles were also prepared using the coprecipitation technique by Heer et al. (2003), who published a pioneering paper in 2003 about the synthesis of Tm3+, Yb3+-doped LuPO4, and Er3+-doped YbPO4 nanocrystals in the form of transparent colloidal solutions, demonstrating the possibility of obtaining UC blue, green, and red light emission in transparent colloidal solutions by laser excitation in the near-IR region around 980 nm.
Few examples of oxyfluoride UC samples prepared by coprecipitation techniques are reported in the literature. Codoped Er3+, Yb3+, Tm3+/Yb3+, Ho3+/Yb3+, and triply doped Er3+/Tm3+/Yb3+ single phase GdOF and Gd4O3F6 nanoparticles with average particle sizes around 25 and 50 nm, respectively, were prepared in aqueous solution under alkaline conditions by a simple coprecipitation method and a heat treatment at 500°C (Passuello et al. 2011a, b). Due to the heat treatment, a certain degree of agglomeration was observed. In the case of triply doped samples, the nanoparticles show bright white light UC emission upon excitation at 980 nm using a diode laser as the excitation source.
A series of Er3+/Tm3+/Yb3+-doped Lu6O5F8 nanoparticles have been prepared by a coprecipitation method (Guo et al. 2013). The average size has been tuned from 20 to 320 nm upon increasing Li+ ion concentration in the host. The detailed crystal structure of Lu6O5F8 was analyzed via Rietveld refinement of the powder x-ray diffraction patterns. It is worth mentioning that Li+ concentration influences the white UC emission. In this case, Li+ ion behaves as a luminescence intensifier.
This synthetic approach is often used to form lanthanide-doped nanoparticles, since it provides high quality nanocrystals, with high control over dimension, monodispersity, and photoluminescence (PL) properties. It involves a heat treatment (~300°C) of lanthanide precursors, usually organometallic compounds (e.g., acetate or trifluoroacetate salts) that decompose in nonpolar high boiling organic solvents, such as oleylamine (OM), trioctylphosphine oxide (TOPO), or 1-octadecene (ODE). Surfactants with capping groups, for instance, oleic acid (OA), are in charge to control the nanoparticle size and to prevent their aggregation, due to long hydrocarbon chains. The main parameters affecting this synthetic approach are reaction temperature, metal precursors and their concentration, nature of the solvent, capping agent(s), and reaction time. By careful tuning of these experimental parameters, highly monodispersed nanoparticles with very good crystallinity have been produced using the thermolysis method. Besides these positive features, the thermolysis method presents some serious drawbacks. In particular, quite expensive procedures with demanding aspects such as high temperatures and air sensitive starting materials handling are involved. Moreover, the formation of highly toxic fluorinated by-products could limit the large-scale application of this synthetic approach in bio-related applications.
A substantial amount of literature has been published in the last 10 years reporting preparation of fluorides with the thermolysis method. One of the first reports was published by Yan et al. (Zhang et al. 2005), who synthesized LaF3 nanocrystals starting from La(CF3COO)3 salt, using OA as the capping agent and ODE as the high boiling noncoordinating solvent. This method was extended to other lanthanide-doped nanoparticles, for instance, for the preparation of the famous upconverter material, NaYF4, by several groups (Abel et al. 2009; Boyer et al. 2006; G. Chen et al. 2010; Cuccia and Capobianco 2007; Yi and Chow 2006). Also, the group of Murray and co-workers (Ye et al. 2010), succeeded in the synthesis of NaYF4:Yb, Er nanocrystals with a controlled size and morphology (spherical/nanorod): this approach definitely provided a way to high quality and monodipersed colloids. Also Yin et al. (Yu et al. 2010), synthesized monodisperse β-NaYF4:Yb, Tm nanocrystals with controlled size (25–150 nm), composition, and shape (sphere, hexagonal prism, and hexagonal plate) by thermolysis of metal trifluoroacetates in hot solutions (300–330°C) containing OA, OM, and ODE.
Another interesting host for UC emission, NaGdF4, was also prepared in nanocrystalline form using the thermolysis method (see Figure 3.2), by the group of Capobianco et al. (Boyer et al. 2007; Naccache et al. 2009). Other groups (Cichos et al. 2014; Johnson et al. 2011; Liu et al. 2010; Z.-L. Wang et al. 2010; Zhou et al. 2010) have investigated this host, also for its interesting magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) properties.
A general synthesis of high quality cubic and hexagonal NaREF4(RE: Pr to Lu, Y) nanocrystals (nanopolyhedra, nanorods, nanoplates, and nanospheres) and NaYF4:Yb, Er/Tm nanocrystals (nanopolyhedra and nanoplates) via the co-thermolysis of Na(CF3COO) and RE(CF3COO)3 in OA/OM/1-ODE was reported (Mai et al. 2006). By tuning the ratio of Na/RE, solvent composition, reaction temperature and time, control of the phase, shape, and size of the nanocrystals has been achieved. Interesting hosts for UC nanomaterials have demonstrated to be the alkaline earth fluorides (D. Chen et al. 2010; Quan et al. 2008). Uniform alkaline earth metal fluoride MF2(M = Mg, Ca, and Sr) nanomaterials with various shapes (tetragonal MgF2 nanoneedles; cubic CaF2 nanoplates and nanopolyhedra; cubic SrF2 nanoplates and nanowires) have been synthesized from the thermolysis of alkaline earth metal trifluoroacetate in hot surfactant solutions, with OA, OM, and ODE (Du et al. 2009). The MF2 nanocrystals were formed by the controlled fluorination of the M–O bond into the M–F bond at the nucleation stage and subsequent growth process. In these cases, the growth of shape-selective MF2 nanocrystals was likely due to the template direction of micellar structures formed by self-assembly of capping ligands and the so-called “Ostwald ripening” process.
Figure 3.2 (a) Excitation and emission spectra of NaGdF4: 15% Ce3+, 5% Tb3+ nanoparticles (1 wt% solution in hexane). (b) 1 wt% solution (hexane) of NaGdF4: 10% Ce3+, 5% Tb3+ nanoparticles under (i) ambient and (ii) 254 nm UV light. 1 wt% solutions of (iii) NaGdF4: 15% Ce3+, 5% Tb3+ and (iv) NaGdF4: 20% Ce3+, 5% Tb3+ nanoparticles (hexane) under 254 nm UV light. (c) TEM image of NaGdF4: 20% Ce3+, 5% Tb3+. (d) Emission spectra of 1 wt% solutions (hexane) of NaGdF4:Ce3+, Tb3+ core and NaGdF4:Ce3+ 20%, Tb3+ 5%/NaYF4 core/shell NPs. (e) 1 wt% solution (hexane) of aged NaGdF4: 20% Ce3+, 5%Tb3+ nanoparticles under (i) ambient and (ii) 254 nm UV light and NaGdF4: 20% Ce3+, 5% Tb3+/NaYF4 nanoparticles under (iii) ambient and (iv) 254 nm UV light. (f) TEM image of NaGdF4: 20% Ce3+, 5% Tb3+/NaYF4 sample. (Reprinted with permission from Boyer, J. C., J. Gagnon, L. A. Cuccia, and J. A. Capobianco. 2007. Synthesis, characterization, and spectroscopy of NaGdF4: Ce3+, Tb3+/NaYF4 core/shell nanoparticles. Chem. Mater. 19 (14):3358–3360. Copyright 2007 American Chemical Society.)
Some examples are reported in the literature describing the preparation of sesquioxides using a thermolysis method. Well-dispersed Y2O3 nanocrystals, with a size less than 10 nm, and self-assembled nanodisks have been synthesized by a simple organometallic route using OM (H. Wang et al. 2005), in which TOPO was added to improve the crystallinity.
Furthermore, monodisperse cubic sesquioxides (from La to Lu and Y) nanomaterials (in the form of ultrathin nanoplates and nanodisks) have been synthesized via a nonhydrolytic approach in OA/OM/ODE (Si et al. 2007). Several lanthanide complexes, such as acetylacetonate, benzoylacetonate, and acetate, have been considered as precursors. The transformation from the complex precursors to the sesquioxides was proposed to occur in two stages: first, the formation of rare earth (RE) oleates by ligand exchange in solution and second, the subsequent decomposition of the oleates into sesquioxides catalyzed by OM.
Gd2O3 nanoplates were synthesized by solution-phase decomposition of gadolinium-acetate precursors in the presence of both coordinating and noncoordinating solvents, such as OM, OA, and ODE (Cao 2004).
Monodispersed RE oxyfluoride nanocrystals with diverse shapes (cubic RE oxyfluoride nanopolyhedra and nanorods) have been prepared from single-source precursors of metal acetates through controlled fluorination in OA/OM/ODE (Sun et al. 2007). To selectively obtain RE oxyfluoride nanocrystals, the fluorination of the RE–O bond to the RE–F bond at the nucleation stage was controlled by finely tuning the ratio of OA/ODE or OA/OM, and the reaction temperature. Tuning of their shape has been realized by further modifying the reaction conditions. Monodispersed cubic phase LaOF and GdOF nanostructures were prepared by decomposing the lanthanide trifluoroacetate precursors in OA and OM (Du et al. 2008). Nanocrystals from 2 to 7 nm size and various shapes (nanopolyhedra and elongated nanocrystals) have been obtained.
The hydro-solvothermal strategy requires relatively low temperatures (usually <250°C) taking advantage of experimental setups involving an autoclave reactor. Despite the mild conditions, the method allows one to obtain nanoparticles with a good level of crystallinity, with good control over dimension and morphology by fine tuning the experimental temperature and reaction time, the nature of the solvent and the surfactant and their molar ratios. As an important advantage with respect to the thermolysis method, it produces a lower amount of toxic by-product. Organic solvents as alcohols or amines are used in the presence of surfactant additives such as OA, EDTA, CTAB, or PEI: nonetheless, water is frequently used as well.
One of the first examples of production of upconverting NaYF4 nanoparticles by the hydrothermal method is reported by Zeng et al. (2005). The solutions containing the metal precursors were transferred to a Teflon-lined autoclave and heated to 140–200°C for 12–24 h. The author succeeded in controlling the size and morphology of the products by the addition of EDTA and CTAB. NaYF4 nanoparticles were also prepared by this method by several other authors, for instance, by Zhao et al. (2008) who prepared Yb3+ and Er3+ codoped cubic and hexagonal-phase NaYF4 nanoparticles in different shapes, using a citrate–yttrium-nitrate complex as the precursor and a treatment in autoclave at different temperatures and reaction times. Citric acid was also used as a capping agent by Jiang et al. (2012), that prepared Tm3+, Yb3+ codoped α-NaYF4 nanocrystals by a one-step hydrothermal method. The morphology of the nanomaterials maintains a spherical shape when the surfactant amount, hydrothermal time, and hydrothermal temperature were varied. Quite interestingly, under 980 nm excitation, intense UV and blue UC emissions were observed from the α-NaYF4 nanoparticles.
Hao and coworkers synthesized via a hydrothermal method (ethanol–water, OA 170°C, 24 h) fluorescent and magnetic (MRI) NaLuF4:Ln (Ln = Gd3+, Yb3+, Tm3+) nanocrystals with efficient NIR-to-NIR emission, useful for in vivo imaging applications. Interestingly, they were able to tune the crystal phase, size, UC properties, and magnetization varying the Gd3+ doping degree (Zeng et al. 2012).
One approach proposed as a general strategy to develop nanomaterials, exploits a phase transfer and separation mechanism occurring at the interfaces of the liquid, solid, and solution (LSS) phases present during the synthesis (X. Wang et al. 2005). In the case of lanthanide-doped luminescent nanocrystals with UC emission properties, the reaction between NaF and Ln acetate salts at 180°C was used to obtain approximately round-shaped nanoparticles of NaYF4, YbF3, LaF3 (4–12 nm), or oval ones of YF3 (100 × 500 nm). This strategy was subsequently implemented by Liu and coworkers (F. Wang et al. 2010), that showed how NaYF4 nanocrystals can be rationally tuned in size, phase (cubic/hexagonal), and emission color using trivalent lanthanide dopant ions at controlled concentrations. The reaction time (~2 h) and phase transition occurred at quite moderate reaction temperature (~230°C). The LSS method was also applied to the synthesis of ultra-small (~5 nm) SrF2 nanocrystals using trivalent lanthanide ions (Ln3+) as doping agents at a concentration up to 40% (mol/mol) (D. Chen et al. 2010). Moreover, with the same wet chemical LSS technique, upconverting monodispersed Yb3+/Er3+-doped CaF2 nanoparticles have been prepared (G. Wang et al. 2009). The obtained nanomaterials not only can be transparently dispersed in cyclohexane but also can be converted into water-soluble ones by oxidizing OA ligands with the Lemieux-von Rudloff reagent. Very interestingly, upon 980 nm laser excitation, the colloidal dispersion in cyclohexane and water showed bright green UC luminescence (UCL), even slightly stronger that of Yb3+/Er3+-doped NaYF4 nanocrystals.
A facile method for the synthesis of polyethylene glycol (PEG) capped, water dispersible lanthanide-doped UC GdF3 NPs using a hydrothermal technique was adopted by Passuello et al. (2012). From the investigation, it was found that the layer of PEG coating of the GdF3 NPs guaranteed a good dispersion of the nanostructure in water and increased the UC emission by decreasing the multiphonon relaxation of the excited states of the Er3+ and Tm3+ ions due to water phonons.
Er3+/Yb3+, Ho3+/Yb3+, and Tm3+/Yb3+ codoped CaF2 of cubic shape NPs have been prepared by a one-step hydrothermal technique by Pedroni et al. (2011) in water using sodium oleate as surfactant. The obtained NPs were easily dispersed in organic solvents as well as in oleate aqueous solutions, without the need for any postsynthesis reaction. Notably, the Ho3+/Yb3+ and Tm3+/Yb3+-doped samples show strong UC emission in the 750–800 nm region upon 980 diode laser excitation, a useful range for biomedical applications. Using the same hydrothermal technique, Tm3+/Yb3+-doped CaF2 and SrF2 were directly obtained using citrate anions as capping agents (Pedroni et al. 2013). Colloidal water dispersions of the doped SrF2 NPs showed a UC emission at 800 nm (due to Tm3+ ions) of about two orders of magnitude higher than similarly doped cubic phase NaYF4 NPs prepared with the same hydrothermal technique. It was found that alkali ions (Na+ or K+), present as counter cations of the citrate salts used as precursors, can be incorporated in the fluoride host crystals as charge compensators and they have a strong influence of the spectroscopic properties of the lanthanide ions.
A shape-controlled synthesis of monodispersed Yb3+ and Er3+-doped CaGd3F11 nanoparticles using a solvothermal method was recently reported by Tian et al. (2014). The morphology of the nanostructures can be tuned to spherical (<10 nm) and one-dimensional nanorods by varying the amounts of the solvents and capping agent in the starting solution. UC emission was found to depend from the shapes of the obtained CaGd3F11 nanoparticles and nanorods, in particular, the nanorods showed a brighter emission with respect to the nanoparticles.
Hydrothermal synthesis (water, pH = 13, 24 h at 180°C), followed by calcination (800°C) was also used by Qu and coworkers (Z. Liu et al. 2013) to form sesquioxides nanoparticles. In particular, they reported about the synthesis of multimodal PEGylated Gd2O3:Yb3+, Er3+ nanorods (PEG-UCNPs) for in vivo UCL, T1-enhanced magnetic resonance, and x-ray computed tomography imaging. PEGylation was introduced using a trialkoxysilane-PEG, conferring long blood circulation time, stability in vivo and noncytotoxic character, as indicated by small-animal experiments. With two different ligands—OA and aminohexanoic acid (AA)—Li and coworkers (Cao et al. 2011) succeeded in the hydrothermal synthesis of high quality water-soluble UC nanocrystals bearing appropriate functional groups using a one-step synthetic strategy. The OA/AA molar ratio allowed to optimize water dispersibility and provided amino groups for conjugation to folic acid (FA) for targeted bioimaging (Figure 3.3).
An interesting approach for the synthesis of cubic Er2O3 nanostructures with high yield and controlled size and shape has been developed via a solvothermal reaction of erbium nitrate in water/ethanol/decanoic acid media (Nguyen et al. 2010). The cubic Er2O3 phase was obtained at a temperature lower than 200°C and by tuning experimental parameters (such as the reaction temperature, the concentration of decanoic acid, and erbium precursor), different sizes and a variety of sheaves and brooms can be obtained. Furthermore, a change of the solvent (anhydrous ethanol instead of water/ethanol) had a strong influence on the particle size. Interestingly, at high precursor concentrations, nanorods were formed due to anisotropic growth. It was found that the UCL properties depend on the particle size of the products.
Figure 3.3 Scheme of hydrothermal reaction for preparing amino-functionalized UCNPs assisted with binary cooperative ligands: hydrophilic 6-AA and hydrophobic oleate. (Reprinted from Biomaterials, 32 (11), Cao, T. Y., Y. Yang, Y. A. Gao, J. Zhou, Z. Q. Li, and F. Y. Li, High-quality water-soluble and surface-functionalized upconversion nanocrystals as luminescent probes for bioimaging, 2959–2968, Copyright 2011, with permission from Elsevier.)
The sol–gel technique has been considered by some groups in the past years to prepare oxide-based UC nanomaterials and it is characterized by hydrolysis and polycondensation of metal alkoxide (or halide)-based precursors. On the other hand, in order to improve the crystallinity of the nanosized materials, a further heat treatment at relatively high temperatures is often carried out. Due to this treatment, the obtained nanoparticles present considerable aggregation, and well-dispersed water solutions are therefore hard to prepare, making their application in the biomedical field difficult. Nonetheless, these NPs can be considered for other applications not requiring very homogeneous dispersions.
An interesting upconverting material is lanthanide-doped ZrO2. De la Rosa et al. prepared Er3+-doped zirconium oxide using the sol–gel process (De la Rosa-Cruz et al. 2003), followed by an annealing treatment at 1000°C for 10 h. It was found that the crystallite sizes presented dependence from the Er3+ concentration in the host, ranging from 28 to 46 nm. UC in the green and red regions were observed with NIR excitation and the intensity of the UC emission bands varied with the Er3+concentration in the host. Moreover, Prasad et al. investigated an interesting modification of the sol–gel technique to generate Er3+-doped ZrO2 nanoparticles, considering a sol–emulsion–gel technique that used reverse micelles formed in emulsions as reactors for the growth of the nanocrystals (Patra et al. 2002). The authors also studied the effects of the Er3+ concentration and different codopants (e.g., Yb3+ and Y3+) in the ZrO2 host on the UC emission. Green and red UC emission at 550 and 670 nm were observed from these oxide nanocrystals upon excitation at 980 nm, the total UC in the green and red regions decreases with increasing concentration of Er3+ ions in the host, while it increased with the presence of Y3+ and Yb3+ ions.
Other binary oxides as TiO2 have revealed to be interesting as hosts for UC emission. Luo et al. (2011) prepared Er3+-doped anatase TiO2 nanoparticles via a sol–gel solvothermal method. From emission and excitation spectra as a function on the temperature in the 10–300 K range, a crystal-field (CF) analysis for the Er3+ ions assuming a C2v site symmetry revealed a relatively large CF strength (549 cm−1). The UC intensity in Yb3+, Er3+ codoped nanoparticles was about five times higher than for Er3+ singly doped counterparts, due to efficient Yb3+ sensitization and energy transfer UC (ETU).
Patra et al. (2003b) investigated the effects of the Er3+ concentration, crystal size and phase, and different processing temperatures on the UC emission for Er3+-doped BaTiO3 and TiO2 nanocrystals, using a sol–emulsion–gel technique. Using the same experimental setup conditions, and the same Er3+ concentration, the observed UC intensity was higher for BaTiO3 than for the TiO2 host. For the TiO2 host, the highest UC intensity was observed for samples heat treated at 800°C, where both the anatase and rutile phases were present. From an analysis of UC spectra and power studies, it was confirmed that UC emission was produced by excited-state absorption (ESA) processes.
The preparation of Ho3+, Yb3+-doped titanate nanotubes was carried out by Pedroni et al. (2012) via a two-step procedure: a first sol–gel process to produce the lanthanide-doped titania and a second hydrothermal treatment in alkaline conditions on the obtained doped titania powders to form the titanate nanotubes. A treatment at various temperatures was carried out with the aim of determining the different structural and optical properties of the nanotubes. It was found that on increasing the heat treatment the nanotube UC was stronger, due to reduction of hydroxyl groups and water on the surface of the nanotubes, resulting in changes in the interlayer distances.
Er3+ and Yb3+, Er3+-doped Y2O3 core–shell particles were synthesized by Dorman et al. (2012) with a two-step process, where the cores were prepared by a molten salt technique and the shell was deposited with a sol–gel process. The authors succeeded inpreparing cores with sizes of 100–150 nm, and shell layers up to 12 nm thick, tunable by controlling the mass ratio between the lanthanide chlorides used as precursors and the core (Er3+-doped Y2O3) nanoparticles. A Y2O3 shell layer with optimal thickness of 8 nm induced a 53% increase in luminescence lifetimes and visible separation in Stark splitting. Optically active-shell layers, as Yb2O3 and Yb3+-doped yttria, also facilitated energy transfer between the lanthanide ions, and it was found that Yb2O3 is an interesting host for the shell and it produce an increased lifetime and low pump power needed for UC. Lu et al. (2008) investigated Tm3+, Yb3+-doped Y2O3 NPs synthesized with the Pechini sol–gel technique, and coated with SiO2 or TiO2 shells using the Stober method. Larger NPs have stronger UC emission than smaller NPs and the core–shell structures are useful to enhance the UCL.
Guo et al. (2004) have investigated the UC properties of other sesquioxides, such as Tm3+, Er3+, and Yb3+-doped cubic phase Gd2O3 nanoparticles, prepared by the sol–gel technique. UC emission upon 980 nm laser excitation has been observed in the blue, green, and red regions with a relevant increase of the red emission with respect to the green one.
Nanocrystalline lanthanide-doped Lu3Ga5O12 garnets have been prepared using a sol–gel technique and subsequent heat treatment at 900°C for 16 h in air, by Venkatramu et al. (2010). The aggregated nanomaterials showed an average particle size of 40 nm. These materials show higher luminescence intensities compared to that found for similarly doped sesquioxides (e.g., Y2O3) but also for other nanocrystalline garnets, as Gd3Ga5O12 and Y3Al5O12.
An interesting investigation on films composed by nanocrystalline lanthanide-doped YVO4 nanoparticles was carried out by Yu et al. The films were prepared with a combined use of a Pechini sol–gel process and soft lithography (Yu et al. 2002). From x-ray diffraction analysis, it was found that the films began to crystallize at 400°C and the crystallinity was found to increase on increasing of the annealing temperatures. Starting from nonpatterned phosphor films, mainly consisting of grains with an average size of 90 nm, crystalline films of different thicknesses were obtained. Quite interestingly, the Sm3+-doped YVO4 films also showed UCL upon laser excitation at 940 nm. In particular, anti-Stokes emissions from the 4G5/2 excited state to the lower lying 6H5/2, 6H7/2, and 6H9/2 states have been observed. As the 6F11/2 level of Sm3+ has a very short lifetime, ESA transitions starting from the 6F11/2 energy level have a low probability and the authors proposed that the most probable UC mechanisms could be an energy transfer between Sm3+ ions.
Combustion synthesis includes controlled explosion reactions and one important advantage of this technique is that the reaction products can be generated in few minutes. Usually, these reactions involve highly exothermic processes that are started by a heat source, to reach temperatures up to 3000°C in the form of a self-sustained combustion propagating through the materials. This technique is most usually considered to synthesize oxide-based upconverting nanoparticles.
Upconverting lanthanide-doped sesquioxides (e.g., Y2O3, Lu2O3, and Gd2O3) prepared by the combustion (or propellant) technique have been investigated by Capobianco et al. in several papers published in the last decade. The first paper on upconverting Er3+-doped nanocrystalline Y2O3 appeared in the literature in the year 2000, describing the UC emission of the Er3+ ions under laser excitation at 815 nm (Capobianco et al. 2000). The sample was prepared by combustion synthesis, using glycine as a fuel. A further heat treatment at 500°C was needed to decompose the residual nitrate ions. The decay times for the Er3+ excited levels obtained for the nanocrystalline sample were found to be in general significantly longer than those observed for the bulk counterpart, due to increased multiphonon relaxation caused by CO2 and water absorbed onto the surface of the nanosized sample. The same preparation technique was also used to prepare Ho3+-doped Y2O3 nanopowders, in order to compare the UC properties with those of the bulk counterpart.
An interesting analysis about the morphological structure of lanthanide-doped Lu2O3 powders obtained by propellant synthesis has been carried out by Polizzi et al. (2004). The samples showed a very porous, open morphology with fractal scaling properties. The building blocks of the fractal aggregates are lanthanide-doped cubic Lu2O3 crystalline particles with 60–90 nm of average size, which exhibit changes in the lattice parameter proportional to the lanthanide ionic radius. A similar morphological structure was also found for nanocrystalline Y2O3 prepared with the same combustion method (Polizzi et al. 2001).
The spectroscopic properties of Er3+, Yb3+-doped Gd2O3 nanoparticles prepared by combustion synthesis have been investigated by Singh et al. (2008, 2009), the samples were prepared using urea as the fuel. The solution containing the precursors was heated at 60°C to evaporate water, becoming a gel and this gel was transferred to a furnace and maintained at 500°C until the auto-ignition started and a voluminous structure formed. Changes in the color and the intensity of the UC emission were observed and attributed to the monoclinic to cubic structural transformation in the Gd2O3 nanoparticles due to a postsynthesis heat treatment of the sample at 600°C and 900°C. The upconverting Gd2O3 nanopowders were found to be also useful for optical thermometry, by considering the Er3+ UC emission in the green region from the two thermally coupled excited states 2H11/2 and 4S3/2 of Er3+, centered at wavelengths of 523 and 548 nm. In the 300–900 K temperature range, the maximum sensitivity derived from the fluorescence intensity ratio technique of the green UC emission is approximately 0.0039 K−1.
Garnets hosts were also considered as hosts for upconverter nanomaterials. Capobianco et al. investigated Er3+-doped and Tm3+ and Yb3+ codoped Gd3Ga5O12 (GGG) prepared by the combustion synthesis using glycine as the fuel. This garnet host resulted to be much less prone to incorporate water and CO2 on the particle surface with respect to sesquioxides, with great benefit to the lanthanide emission properties, increased by a less pronounced nonradiative decay due to water phonons. NIR to visible UC of the nanocrystalline Er3+-doped Gd3Ga5O12 was studied following excitation of the 4I9/2 exited state upon 800 nm laser excitation (Vetrone et al. 2003). It was found that if the Er3+ doping is low (around 1%) ESA was the predominant mechanism responsible for populating the upper emitting states. However, as the Er3+ concentration was increased to 5%, the decay times for the UC emissions were lengthened and deviated from exponentiality, suggesting the presence of ETU. The 1% each Tm3+ and Yb3+ codoped Gd3Ga5O12 nanostructured sample showed strong UC emission in the UV (1D2 → 3H6), blue (1D2 → 3F4), blue-green (1G4 → 3H6), red (1G4 → 3F4), and NIR (1G4 → 3H5/3H4 → 3H6) regions upon excitation of the Yb3+ ions with a 980 nm laser radiation (Pandozzi et al. 2005). Due to subsequent energy transfers from the Yb3+ ion to the Tm3+ ions (energy transfer efficiency about 0.576).
Ionic liquids (ILs) are considered nowadays interesting materials for preparation of inorganic materials as a “green” alternative to the conventional solvents (Lorbeer et al. 2010, 2011). They have unique properties, as thermal and chemical stability, a wide electrochemical window. Moreover, ILs can act as capping agents or surfactants in the inorganic synthesis. Although ILs are very useful for nanoparticles preparation, a certain amount of agglomeration of the prepared nanoparticles is one of the main drawbacks of the technique.
In the past few years, some papers have appeared in the literature to prepare upconverting nanomaterials using the ILs technique, succeeding also to generate various nanocrystal sizes and morphologies. Eu3+-doped GdF3 nanoparticles have been prepared by the ILs technique by Lorbeer et al. (2010) with a microwave reaction starting from the lanthanide acetates. Fast and efficient synthesis of small, uniform, oxygen-free lanthanide nanofluorides with excellent luminescence has been achieved and a quantum efficiency of up to 145% was determined. Moreover, the same group succeeded in preparing pure, oxygen-free hexagonal EuF3 nanoparticles by reacting europium acetate hydrate with PF6 and BF4 ILs at 120°C using microwave synthesis, with reaction times as short as 30 s (Lorbeer et al. 2011). Extremely small particles (<15 nm) were obtained and the morphology varied from nearly spherical and cuboid to rodlike crystallites forming larger clusters. Very interestingly, the size and shape varied in different ILs. Lanthanide-doped YF3 nanoparticles were prepared by Nuñez and coworkers using BmimBF4 as the fluoride source (Nuñez and Ocaña 2007). In most cases, highly uniform NPs were obtained and their size could be varied in the nanometer range by adjusting the nature and concentration of the starting lanthanide precursors. Zhang et al. (2008) have synthesized a series of lanthanide fluoride nanocrystals in three ILs (i.e., OmimPF6, OmimBF4, and BmimPF6), utilizing the partial hydrolysis of PF6− and BF4− to introduce a fluoride source. Lanthanum fluoride nanocrystals can be obtained in a large amount (products up to 0.15 g per 10 mL solvents) with the ILs technique. Interestingly, in these “all-in-one” systems, the ILs acted as solvents, reaction agents, and templates. Regarding different upconverting fluorides, water-soluble and pure hexagonal-phase Yb3+ or Er3+ and Tm3+-doped NaYF4 nanoparticles were successfully obtained by Liu et al. (2009) with use of a IL, BmimBF4, which acts as solvent, template, and also fluorine source. One interesting advantage of the obtained nanocrystals is that the ILs overlayer on their surface renders them directly dispersed in water.
Spherical NaYF4 nanoclusters have been synthesized using an IL (1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate) based technique using a microwave reaction system. The nanoclusters have diameters ranging from 200 to 430 nm and are formed by the self-assembly of smaller NaYF4 nanoparticles. Quite interestingly, the size of the nanoclusters could be easily controlled by variations of the precursor amounts. It was demonstrated that the ILs have key roles as solvents for the reaction, absorbents of microwave radiation, and the main fluorine sources for the NaYF4 generation. The obtained nanoclusters exhibit excellent UC properties.
An interesting approach combining more synthetic techniques was introduced by He et al. (2011) to prepare lanthanide-doped upconverting NaGdF4 nanocrystals with various crystalline structures. This approach used an OA/IL two-phase system that combined the advantages of the thermal decomposition and ILs techniques, exploiting the two-phase approach in the OA- and IL-phase through a one-step controllable reaction.
Figure 3.4 (a) Representation showing dopant ions in KGdF4 host and the crystal defects for the core-only nanoparticles. (b) Schematization of the core–shell nanoparticles. (c) TEM image of the KGdF4:Tm3+, Yb3+ core-only nanoparticles. (d, e) TEM images of the KGdF4:Tm3+, [email protected] core–shell nanoparticles showing an increase in the particles size. (f) TEM size distributions for the KGdF4:Tm3+, Yb3+ core-only nanoparticles and (g) the KGdF4:Tm3+, [email protected] core–shell nanoparticles. (Wong, H.-T., F. Vetrone, R. Naccache, H. L. W. Chan, J. Hao, and J. A. Capobianco. 2011. Water dispersible ultra-small multifunctional KGdF4:Tm3+, Yb3+ nanoparticles with near-infrared to near-infrared upconversion. J. Mater. Chem. 21 (41):16589–16596. Reproduced by permission of The Royal Society of Chemistry.)
“Core-only” lanthanide-doped nanoparticles, prepared with different synthetic approaches, present surface defects that are detrimental for UC emission. Moreover, lanthanide ions on the surface of nanoparticles which have been dispersed in solvents, experience an increased nonradiative multiphonon relaxation (due to the solvent phonons) with respect to those ions located in the interior of the nanoparticle. To improve the emission efficiency, a strategy is to cover the nanoparticle with an additional shell, usually with a second step procedure, using core-only nanoparticles as seeds. Quite recently, this general approach was applied by several research groups to develop NIR-to-NIR emitting nanocrystals, and can also be used to design core–shell ([email protected]) nanocrystals that present fine tuning of UC emission—exploiting trapping of the migrating energy by the activators and the elimination of deleterious cross-relaxation phenomena (Wang et al. 2011). With the [email protected] approach it is still possible to reach highly monodispersed nanoparticles, but some complications could arise from poorly uniform shell formation or in the purification steps, because of the self-nucleation of the shell precursors.
Capobianco et al. (Vetrone et al. 2009) synthesized hydrophobic NaGdF4:Er3+, Yb3+ [email protected]4 inert-shell nanoparticles and NaGdF4:Er3+, Yb3+ [email protected]4:Yb3+ active-shell nanoparticles (average particle size 16 nm) by a modified thermal decomposition synthesis, starting from trifluoroacetate precursors, ODE and OA. It was found that the active shell protects the active Er3+ ions from nonradiative decays, and efficiently transfers the incident NIR radiation to the active core. The same research group developed water dispersible ultra-small (<10 nm) multifunctional KGdF4:Tm3+, Yb3+ nanoparticles with NIR-to-NIR UC emission properties (λex = 980 nm, λem = 803 nm), for which the luminescence efficiency was optimized with the core–shell approach. The KGdF4:Tm3+, Yb3+@KGdF4 core–shell nanoparticles were encapsulated with a PEG-phospholipid shell to obtain a water suspension (Figure 3.4) (Wong et al. 2011).
Small [email protected] oleate-capped NaGdF4:Nd3+@NaGdF4 nanocrystals (average diameter 15 nm) with efficient NIR-to-NIR downconversion PL (λex = 740 nm, λem = 850–900 nm) were developed also by Prasad et al. for in vitro and in vivo imaging (Chen et al. 2012). They adapted a previously reported synthetic method bearing to hexagonal-phase [email protected] NaYF4:Yb, [email protected]4:Yb, Er nanocrystals containing Tm3+ and Er3+ ions in the core and in the shell, respectively. In this case, a NaGdF4 shell covering a NaGdF4:Nd3+ core suppressed nonradiative recombination processes at the nanoparticle surface, enhancing the PL quantum yield up to 0.40.
Some of the synthetic limitations of these approaches can be by-passed using an epitaxial layer-by-layer growth of the nanocrystals, also called “self-focusing by Ostwald ripening.” In this case, sacrificial nanoparticles are injected in the reaction mixture, and upon rapid dissolution (defocusing), they contribute to the formation of a uniform shell surrounding the NaYF4:Yb3+@Er3+ core (self-focusing) (Johnson et al. 2012).
Recently, Zanzoni et al. developed a solvothermal two-step technique to prepare SrF2 core–shell nanoparticles, in order to investigate the interaction between a protein (ubiquitin) and upconverting NPs. In this work, the SrF2:Yb3+@SrF2:Yb3+, Tm3+ core–shell architecture was adopted to ensure an efficient absorption of the NIR radiation by Yb3+ in both the core and shell, and to guarantee that a significant amount of emitting Tm3+ ions are located at the NPs surface, permitting a better investigation on the NPs–protein interaction (Zanzoni et al. 2016).
An implementation to the synthesis of lanthanide-doped NPs is based on cation exchange reactions—taking place at the nanoparticle surface—to develop multifunctional nanoprobes.
Following this scheme, a NIR-to-NIR emitting system was developed by Liu et al. (2011). The authors started from NaYF4:Yb3+, Er3+ oleate-capped nanoparticles obtained by solvothermal synthesis, to develop multifunctional upconversion nanoparticles (NaYF4:Yb3+, Er3+), combining magnetic (Gd3+), positron emission tomography (PET) (18F), and targeted recognition (FA) properties (Figure 3.5). In particular, Gd3+ ions were introduced on the surface of the nanocrystals by cation exchange with Y3+ ions, while 18F was introduced for PET imaging by interaction with the RE ions.
In a related example, Van Veggel et al. performed cation exchange with Gd3+ ions on upconverting NaYF4:Yb3+, Tm3+ nanoparticles (Dong et al. 2012). They started from oleate-stabilized NaYF4:Yb3+, Tm3+ nanoparticles (average diameter 19–20 nm) synthesized using a coprecipitation method in organic media at 300°C (Figure 3.6).
Ligand exchange of the as-prepared oleate-stabilized nanoparticles with PVP (Johnson et al. 2010) provided a water dispersible system that was exposed to Gd3+ to obtain the bimodal NaYF4:Yb3+, [email protected]4 [email protected] nanoparticles. The sub-nanometer NaGdF4 shell (ca. 0.6 nm) conferred very high proton relaxivity to the nanoparticle for targeted MRI applications.
Figure 3.5 Schematic representation of 18F-labeled magnetic-UC functional nanocrystals. OM: oleyl amine; FA: folic acid; OA: oleic acid; and AA: aminocaproic acid. (Reprinted with permission from Liu, Q., Y. Sun, C. Li, J. Zhou, C. Li, T. Yang, X. Zhang, T. Yi, D. Wu, and F. Li. 2011. F-18-labeled magnetic-upconversion nanophosphors via rare-earth cation-assisted ligand assembly. ACS Nano 5 (4):3146–3157. Copyright 2011 American Chemical Society.)
Nanoparticles tailored for biological imaging applications need to provide stable suspension in water and buffered solutions, and often the possibility to introduce chemical functionalities for biomolecule targeting. Most of the “as-prepared” lanthanide-doped nanoparticles are capped with hydrophobic molecules such as oleate (Li et al. 2008) or OM (Chan et al. 2012), and for this reason, several approaches were developed to increase the polarity of the nanoparticle surface to obtain water dispersibility. An overview of these synthetic approaches has been recently reviewed in focused publications (Muhr et al. 2014; Sedlmeier and Gorris 2014). Silica encapsulation offers the possibility to endow lanthanide-doped nanocrystals with a surface material that is hydrophilic, transparent to radiation and photophysically inert, simple to functionalize, and intrinsically nontoxic (Arap et al. 2013; Bonacchi et al. 2011; Genovese et al. 2014). The shell usually does not affect the emission efficiency of the nanocrystals, and actually in some cases improves it. Beside this behavior, silica can be independently doped with other fluorophores or contrast agents (Qian et al. 2009), or drugs to develop multimodal imaging or theranostic tools: this possibility is fostered by mesoporous silica shells (Li et al. 2013; P. Yang et al. 2012), formed adding to the synthetic mixture surfactant agents like CTAB (Liu et al. 2012; Qian et al. 2009).
Figure 3.6 Schematization of the cation exchange process to form NaYF4:Yb, [email protected] core–shell nanoparticles. (Dong, C., A. Korinek, B. Blasiak, B. Tomanek, and F. C. J. M. van Veggel. 2012. Cation exchange: A facile method to make NaYF4:Yb3+, [email protected] [email protected] nanoparticles with a thin, tunable, and uniform shell. Chem. Mater. 24 (7):1297–1305. Reproduced by permission of The Royal Society of Chemistry.)
A few synthetic approaches are available to cover lanthanides-doped nanosystems: nanoparticles presenting hydrophobic capping agents are frequently coated using a reverse microemulsion approach (water-in-oil) (Jalil and Zhang 2008). Silica coating involves an increase of the nanoparticles average diameter, a process that may cause some loss of monodispersity of the starting material: for this reason, most of the reports adopt this approach, starting from very monodisperse OA-capped nanocrystals and using the microemulsion method for silica shell formation, that guarantees nanocrystals core confinement within the reverse micelles of the microemulsion (Li et al. 2008). Shell thickness can be varied mainly acting on the amount of tetrathoxysilane introduced in the microemulsion and/or on the surfactant-to-water ratio, the main parameter affecting the number of reverse micelles within the microemulsion.
In a recent example, Li et al. (Zhu et al. 2014) developed a NIR-to-NIR emitting imaging (Figure 3.7).
Lanthanide-doped core was synthesized by a solvothermal method (average diameter 20 nm), and during the silica coating step ethoxysilane functionalized PEG (PEG–siloxane) was added into the microemulsion to achieve PEGylation (final hydrodynamic diameter ~65 nm).
Hydrophilic nanocrystals are usually coated in water–alcohol mixtures using a Stöber approach (Stöber et al. 1968). With this strategy, Wolfbeis et al. (Mader et al. 2010) faced the coating of lanthanide-doped nanoparticles and microparticles with average diameters spanning from 50 nm to 15 µm. They adopted a click chemistry-based strategy to functionalize the surface of the nano- and microparticles with a few “click reagents” and alkyne-modified fluorescent dyes.
Figure 3.7 TEM images of (a) NaYF4:Yb, Tm UCNPs and (b) NaYF4:Yb3+, [email protected] nanoparticles modified with PEG (PEG-UCNPs), and room temperature UCL spectrum of PEG-UCNPs in water (5 mg/mL, λex = 980 nm). (Zhu, X., B. Da Silva, X. Zou, B. Shen, Y. Sun, W. Feng, and F. Li. 2014. Intra-arterial infusion of PEGylated upconversion nanophosphors to improve the initial uptake by tumors in vivo. RSC Adv. 4 (45):23580–23584. Reproduced by permission of The Royal Society of Chemistry.)
The silica modification quite often produces systems that are prone to aggregation processes and unspecific binding, and for this reason just the formation of an ultrathin silica shell of few nanometers (Li and Zhang 2006; F. Liu et al. 2013) or proper functionalization treatments (Bagwe et al. 2006) were developed.
Polymer-coated lanthanide-doped nanoparticles can also be coated by a silica shell, since some polymers such as PVP (Li and Zhang 2006) favor the condensation of a silica layer. This approach moves toward more direct coating protocols since PVP is often used as a stabilizing agents in many hydrothermal syntheses. Surface modification can be carried out during the growth of the silica shell or after its formation, and besides colloidal stabilization endow nanoparticles with moieties bearing –NH2 (M. Wang et al. 2009), –COOH (F. Liu et al. 2013), –SH (Y. Yang et al. 2012), or functional groups for click chemistry (Mader et al. 2010).
Despite the great attention devoted to UCNPs presenting unique optical and chemical properties, their practical application is still limited. This is mainly due to a few demanding features including their nontrivial and, sometimes, poorly reproducible synthetic procedures. In this chapter, we have summarized the recent achievements in the development of more and more efficient preparation methods, with emphasis on the pros and cons of each strategy (Table 3.1). Presently, with a careful control and tuning of the reaction conditions, it is possible to obtain monodispersed and customized UCNPs with many different components. It has to be underlined, however, that the quantum yield of these materials is still generally not very high and it dramatically depends not only on the components but also on the architecture of the nanoparticle (local environment around the lanthanide ions and structure). Consequently, the research on new and optimized synthetic and surface modification methods is a fundamental step toward the application of these species. Great efforts are now devoted to investigate nondemanding and reproducible approaches for large-scale preparations of multifunctional, multi-shell UCNPs able to fulfill practical needs.