A Mixed Membership Approach to the Assessment of Political Ideology from Survey Responses

Authored by: Edoardo M. Airoldi , David M. Blei , Elena A. Erosheva , Stephen E. Fienberg , Justin H. Gross , Daniel Manrique-Vallier

Handbook of Mixed Membership Models and Their Applications

Print publication date:  November  2014
Online publication date:  November  2014

Print ISBN: 9781466504080
eBook ISBN: 9781466504097
Adobe ISBN:

10.1201/b17520-9

 Download Chapter

 

Abstract

Political scientists have long observed that members of the public do not tend to exhibit highly constrained patterns of political beliefs and values in the way that partisan elites often do. In answering survey questions designed to measure latent ideology, they may act as if drawing responses randomly from different perspectives. In the American context, survey respondents frequently defy easy categorization as prototypical liberal or conservative, and yet their response patterns reflect structure that may be characterized by reference to such ideal types. We propose a mixed membership approach to survey-based measurement of ideology. Modeling survey respondents as partial members of a small number of ideological classes allows us to interpret the “mixed signals” they seem to send as a natural consequence of their competing inclinations. We illustrate our approach by reanalyzing data from a classic study of core beliefs and values (Feldman, 1988) and find that the most dramatic difference between prototypical members of the two main ideologies identified is not their vision of what society should be but rather their belief in what American society actually is.

 Cite
Search for more...
Back to top

Use of cookies on this website

We are using cookies to provide statistics that help us give you the best experience of our site. You can find out more in our Privacy Policy. By continuing to use the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.