Reproductive Testing for Disability

Authored by: Adrienne Asch , David Wasserman

The Routledge Companion to Bioethics

Print publication date:  December  2014
Online publication date:  December  2014

Print ISBN: 9780415896665
eBook ISBN: 9780203804971
Adobe ISBN: 9781136644849


 Download Chapter



Two developments in the 1970s and 1980s led to a striking contrast in public attitudes and policies toward having children with disabilities. On the one hand, the more routine character of prenatal genetic testing (and the availability of legal abortions) made it increasingly common, and perhaps expected, for parents to abort fetuses found to have “serious” disabilities. The termination rate for fetuses with one of the most common and easily detected conditions, Down syndrome, was estimated to be at or over 90 percent (e.g., Shaffer et al. 2006). On the other hand, those two decades saw the emergence of a strong disability rights movement and the reconceptualization of disability as a social phenomenon, the interaction of a physical or mental condition with an exclusionary environment. Informed by this social model, the disability rights movement played a major role in the passage of landmark disability discrimination laws in the United States in 1973 and 1990. As the abortion of fetuses with disabilities became routine, children and adults with disabilities became more visible and better integrated into educational and social activities. It was not long before proponents of the latter development observed a deep tension with the former.

Search for more...
Back to top

Use of cookies on this website

We are using cookies to provide statistics that help us give you the best experience of our site. You can find out more in our Privacy Policy. By continuing to use the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.