Sorry, you do not have access to this eBook
A subscription is required to access the full text content of this book.
Metrics
Views
336
In This Chapter
-
Support Communication in Culturally Diverse Families
- Support Communication in Culturally Diverse Families: The Role of Stigma
- Goffman's Symbolic Interactionist Theory: A Theoretical Point of Departure for Understanding Stigma and Support Communication within Culturally Diverse Families
- Identity as a Property of Interaction in Goffman's Symbolic Interactionist Theory
- Implications of Goffman's Symbolic Interactionist Theory for Ethnic Minority Group Member's Receipt of Social Support
- A Case in Point: Stigma and Support Communication among Asian-Descent Immigrants in the U.S.A.
- Stigma Versus Perceived Stigma Among Members of Ethnic Minority Groups and Culturally Diverse Families
- Reconciling the Opposing Outcomes: Considering Perceived Stigma and Support Dynamics
- Negative Support Exchanges Involving Members of Ethnic Minority Groups and Culturally Diverse Families
- The Role of Concealability of Stigma in Support Exchanges Among Members of Ethnic Minority Groups and Culturally Diverse Families
- The Role of Strength of Group Identity in Support Communication Processes Among Members of Ethnic Minority Groups and Culturally Diverse Families
- The Role of Stereotype Threat in Support Communication Processes Among Members of Ethnic Minority Groups and Culturally Diverse Families
- Generalizability of Stereotype Threat and Support Communication Processes Across Members of Various Racial Minority Groups
- Generalizability of Stereotype Threat and Support Communication Processes Across Members of Various National Minority Groups
- Generalizability of Stereotype Threat and Support Communication Processes Across Members of Various Religious Minority Groups
- Closing Remarks
- References
Abstract
To mark a person implies that [a] deviant condition has been noticed and recognized as a problem in [an] interaction or [in a social or personal] relationship. To stigmatize a person generally carries a further implication that the mark has been linked by an attributional process to dispositions that discredit the bearer, i.e., that “spoil” [the bearer's] identity.
Other ways to access this content:
Email to request access
Purchase this book
Related chapters
Search for more...
© Informa UK Limited, an Informa Group Company
Home | About RHO | Collections
| Free trial
| How to buy
| Promotions
| Contact us | Help & FAQs
Librarian resources
| Privacy policy
| Cookies
| Terms & conditions
