ABSTRACT
Law and society research in and about Latin America have been particularly beneficial in elucidating the gap between the ideals of racial equality laws in the region and the actual subordinated status of its racialized subjects. This chapter maps recurring research themes in the race-related socio-legal literature, mostly focusing on studies about Afrodescendant populations and the ways in which states throughout the region have dealt with ideas of race and racial discrimination. The author organizes this literature according to the analysis of what Latin American states have achieved – or not – in addressing racial inclusion, racial discrimination, and racial equality through reparations and affirmative action. As a result, the author identifies three sets of socio-legal debates: (1) the limits of multicultural constitutional reform for full political participation; (2) the limits of the Latin American emphasis on criminal law to redress discriminatory actions; and (3) the challenges to implementing race conscious public policies such as affirmative action. Following the author’s mapping of the field, the author signals the resistance of legal systems to enforcing anti-discrimination measures in order to show that future research should interrogate the judicial presumption that racial violence does not and has not existed in Latin America, and the resulting social disempowerment of not naming violence as racial.
