Causality in Islamic Philosophy

Authored by: Luis Xavier López-Farjeat

The Routledge Companion to Islamic Philosophy

Print publication date:  September  2015
Online publication date:  August  2015

Print ISBN: 9780415881609
eBook ISBN: 9781315708928
Adobe ISBN: 9781317484332

10.4324/9781315708928.ch11

 Download Chapter

 

Abstract

Islamic discussions on causality are frequently related to two main philosophical issues, namely, the nature of God as the causal agent par excellence and the creation or origination of the world. Islamic theologians and philosophers both built their different conceptions of causality upon Greek sources, mainly Neoplatonic—such as the Arabic version of the Liber de causis (Taylor 2012), some texts derived from Plotinus’s Enneads known as the Plotiniana arabica (d’Ancona 2010), and some Neoplatonic commentators on Aristotle’s works (Wisnovsky 2002). From the Neoplatonic sources, metaphysicians such as al-Kind?, al-F?r?b?, and Ibn S?n? developed the notion of primary causality which was essential to argue for the existence of a First Cause (al-‘illa al-?l?) or God as responsible for the origination or creation of being (Taylor 2012). Nevertheless, the Aristotelian tradition was also quite influential: from Aristotle’s Physics and Metaphysics the Islamic tradition took the characterization of the four causes as something essential for their comprehension of the natural world and of the moving heavens. Aristotle’s conception of causality, however, was controversial for some theologians, mainly al-Ghaz?l? and the Ash‘arites, given that it explained natural phenomena without appealing to the necessity of a creator.

 Cite
Search for more...
Back to top

Use of cookies on this website

We are using cookies to provide statistics that help us give you the best experience of our site. You can find out more in our Privacy Policy. By continuing to use the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.