ABSTRACT
“Nuclear deterrence” describes how states use nuclear weapons to discourage the aggression of other states by threatening them with nuclear punishment. “Communication” is commonly associated with theories and policies of nuclear deterrence (e.g., as a requirement for its effectiveness). Deeper exploration, however, uncovers at least four co-existing images of communication: as “Information,” “Interaction,” “Signification,” and “Discourse.” This chapter clarifies the premises, functions, and implications of these images. It argues that scholars and policymakers benefit from greater appreciation for the distinctiveness of communication as a complex phenomenon that is conceptualized and practiced differently across deterrence spheres. A brief case study of symbolism developed in the U.S.–North Korean deterrence relationship illustrates the benefits of communicative analysis.
